Guest Post

HAVE A BOOK TO PROMOTE? Lyrical Pens welcomes guest posts. Answer a questionnaire or create your own post. FYI, up front: This site is a definite PG-13. For details, contact cjpetterson@gmail.com cj
Showing posts with label Stephen King. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephen King. Show all posts

Sunday, June 5, 2016

Flogging the Fear of Failure

cj Sez: Watched a TV interview with James Patterson this morning, and I was encouraged to learn that his first novel was rejected thirty-one times before it was published. Even after publication, it didn’t “do all that well.” Failure didn’t discourage him; it encouraged him. He wanted to write.

So, where did his worldwide success come from, besides having some natural talent for story telling? What he did was set about learning and analyzing the genre he wanted to write, so he could become the best writer he could be. Like most authors (I think the generalization is true), he started out writing part-time because he had a day job. Now, he writes full-time, every day but Sunday. As of January 2016, his books have sold more than 350 million copies worldwide.

From bios I’ve read, many, if not all, successful writers have some fear of failure, especially at the beginning of their careers. Perhaps they get an idea they’re excited to develop. The words flow like magic onto the page, but the farther they get into the writing, the more they start to second-guess their story-telling abilities. Doubts creep in: Someone’s already told this story, better. No one is going to read this drivel. It’ll never sell.

Those possibilities exist for all authors, even James Patterson, Stephen King, Patricia Cornwell, et al., and sometimes, though not often, they have a book that doesn’t sell. Fortunately for their fans, they never stop writing their wonderful stories.

In his memoir, On Writing, Stephen King writes: “I had been playing with the idea of writing a little book about writing for a year or more ///but had held back because I didn’t trust my own motivations—why did I want to write about writing? What made me think I had anything worth saying? The easy answer is that someone who has sold as many books of fiction as I have must have something worthwhile to say about writing it, but the easy answer isn’t always the truth.”

If you want to reduce your chances of failure, study the craft…workshops, conferences, writers’ groups, read-read-read…and publish a professional, well-edited book.

I also suggest that you write for yourself first. When you’re the only one you have to please, it reduces the stress of arranging coherent sentences into a story arc on a blank page.

What was the first thing you wrote? A poem? A memoir? A little piece of fiction? If you’re like me, you kept it and every once in a while, you resurrect it and wonder, “What was I thinking?”

Passing on a note:  2016 Killer Nashville Scholarship Offer . . . The deadline isn't until July 1, so you have time. Hop on over to www.fundsforwriters.com/killernashvillescholarship for more details. 

That’s it for today. You-all guys keep on keeping on, and I’ll try to the same.

cj
cjpetterson@gmail.com
Choosing Carter  -- Kindle  /  Nook  /  Kobo   /  iTunes/iBook
Deadly Star --  Kindle  / Nook  / Kobo


PS:  The toons are from Facebook.

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

Self-publish, Indie, Traditional???




As we rush around to meet and greet and purchase and return, 2016 is making a wild dash in our direction. With the constancy of change in the world of publishers, agents, and genres, I pledge not to let it overwhelm me again this year.  It’s enough to drive us to write with crayons (have you seen the new coloring books for adults?) and chalk, ignoring anything with a plug or battery. When I asked a teen what she wanted for Christmas last year, her response was “anything that begins with a lower case i.” She has the same wish this year; after all, there are more i's to choose from.

While I use technology to write and edit in my freelance work, and I have mastered three new software systems this year—master may be stretching things—I am pleased with my new ability to add some really, really cool colors and pictures, which I now know how to crop—to my website and blogs. I created my own website: http://editwriteteach.com, have a monthly newsletter, and offer classes online.

I still love a pencil and a pen.
My fingers unleash creativity via a handheld instrument and I do not mean an electronic pad, probably because I grew up writing with chalk on my school slate. Wait! That was my parents.

We have enough experience with e-books now to know that books from traditional publishers weeded out the wheat from the chafe, something I am grateful they do and wish more authors would practice. However, with the “big guys” like Stephen King, Carolyn Haines, and J K Rowling, moving to indie and self-publishing, I’m following their gigantic footsteps to release my first novella in 2016. This summary article posted on June 26, 2015 on Book Works elucidates some of the problems I’m referencing. With a slant to self-publishing, this piece is still a good summary article. https://www.bookworks.com/2015/06/why-stephen-king-j-k-rowling-joe-konrath-and-others-are-switching-to-indie-publishing-at-least-on-some-of-their-books/

Writers are chasing a moving target, but innovation can be a good thing. (Think sticky notes and cell phones.) I will be testing the market to see if my work is viable with readers. My work primarily set in the fifties in the Deep South is a World War II retrospective. It has brought me a surplus of confusion in critique groups—a total of six, as well as feedback from writers in Chicago, Hawaii, and Texas—and includes such a hodge-podge of feedback, that I’ve decided to take it to the market and let readers decide. Personally, I want my work in hard copy, so companies like Amazon, don’t change or decide to follow their own rules one day and dump it, but I’m going to test it in Kindle shorts or direct at an absurdly low price.

Here are a few examples of the critiques and by the way, they all say without exception that my writing is beautiful, they love my characters and can see my settings, and the voice of my protagonist is spot-on.

So what is the problem? Take a look at these examples.
  • A section following each chapter with a journal entry by the main secondary character is a turn-off; It is perfect to show the lack of communication between the protagonist (age 12) and her mother, a major thread for the coming-of-age book.
  • The prologue is too melodramatic; It touched my heart and set the tone for the underlying familial problems.
  • The opening of each of the three distinct parts (in that version) is boring and repetitive; Remove some of the info from the openings and move it to the storyline to make the openings shorter; Ditch the backstory in the manuscript.
  • Take out the backstory and move to a prologue; Drop the prologue and move the backstory to the main storyline.
  • The use of dialect for the characters is a turnoff; It was the right amount to “show” the characters and the period without making the reading laborious.
There is more, but I imagine you have the idea by now. So what to do with the feedback? Read it, value it, and toss out what I don’t like, things all writers know. I finally decided to revise it for the trillionth time and put the work out there to see what happens.


If I don’t get it published, I will still be writing and revising inside my coffin or vase or at the bottom of the sea.

 Write Like You Mean It!   Mahala

Sunday, September 20, 2015

The important opening line

cj Sez:  The paperback version of Choosing Carter launched on Wednesday, and I have a copy in hand! The cover is even nicer in "real life."
If you get a chance to read it, do me a favor and review it on Amazon as well. Appreciate it!

Today, I was privileged to speak to the Baldwin Writers Group in Daphne, AL, and had a great time. Thanks, folks, for the kind invitation. I very much appreciated the opportunity and your hospitality.

One of the topics I spoke on was the importance of a good, inviting opening line, opening paragraph, or opening chapter. You read a lot of advice that says start a story in the middle of some captivating situation. This is the hook with which a writer can snag the reader’s interest.

Ken Follet, in The Pillars of the Earth, starts off with “The small boys came early to the hanging.” Wouldn’t you want to find out more?

This one from Toni Morrison’s Paradise speaks volumes:  “They shoot the white girl first.”

One of my personal favorites is from Corrie ten Boom’s memoir, Prison Letters: “From time to time, I wrote short sketches on scraps of paper.”

In a 2013 interview with Joe Fassler, Stephen King said: “An opening line should invite the reader to begin the story.” He goes on, “For me a good opening sentence really begins with voice.” He thinks readers are drawn to the story because of the voice of the writer.

In each of the opening-line examples above, I believe you can get a good sense of the author’s voice, how the rest of the story is going to be told.

Introductory lines are hard to write and generally fluid; that is, they change as the writer gets further into the story. King, himself, said it used to take him months or even years to settle on an opening line. (I doubt it takes him years now, considering how prolific and masterful a writer he is.) He also said, “A really bad first line can convince me not to buy a book—because, god, I’ve got plenty of books already—and an unappealing style in the first moments is reason enough to scurry off.”

Wow, would I hate that. All those hours and months that turned into years wasted because I blew the first line.

For both of my romantic suspense novels, I tried to develop first lines that fit both the story and the genre.

Here’s my first line for Deadly Star:   
“I am not going to die; I am not going to die.”

And for Choosing Carter:   
Bryn McKay’s body ricocheted off the passenger door as the pickup, engine roaring, veered from one side of the Colorado mountain road to the other.

What do you think?  

Okay, you-all guys keep on keeping on, and I’ll try to do the same.


cj
cjpetterson@gmail.com

Choosing Carter (Pub: Crimson Romance)
   http://amzn.to/1TlMC1T (Amazon)
   http://bit.ly/1PrBsZj  (B&N)
Deadly Star (Pub: Crimson Romance)  

Thursday, September 3, 2015

Post vs. Articles Part II



As a continuation of last week’s post about blogs vs articles, I recently read an article that purported to show the differences between a blog post and an article online. Let’s look at some of the elements they listed:
Article: Casual writing style on a blog post, scholarly in an article.
MC: If you are writing on a travel blog about your vacation or recent mission trip, you could be casual with lots of photos and comments on the fun you are having and give some historical information about the site without being scholarly. However, if you are writing an article for an online encyclopedia about deserts in Egypt, a scholarly style is in order without your comments about the fun you had sliding down a sand dune in Egypt with your children. Note I said scholarly; I did not say boring.

Article: A blog post is primarily your opinion about the topic; whereas, an article post is more factual and doesn’t allow for your opinion.
MC: Don’t be fooled. Readers want to know what the topic will do for them, and they depend on your  help to see that.
Followers are Key: Readers expect more from those they follow. They expect well-researched information, but they want more from you. They want your opinion. They can find a list of facts in any encyclopedia or a quick Google search. If you want them to follow your site regularly and recommend it to others, they must “tune in” to find out what your take on the subject is. They want to know what you think, feel, and opine about the facts based on your experience. A few clicks and they know whether you are regurgitating a list of facts or interpreting the list to assist them to understand the topic. And, yes, they want to be up close and personal.
Caution: Giving out personal information may come back to haunt you. You’ve seen the cops and robbers television shows that send shivers up your spine. Use some practical safety guidelines when giving out family information like home address, children and grandchildren names and pictures, your social security number - gotcha ya! Be smart about what your share with the world you cannot see.
As a freelance blogger and newsletter writer for a wide variety of clients from plumbers to physicians (although what they do is similar in construct: analysis and treatment), I do research on a specific topic with a request from my client. Coupling that information with client personalization: opinion, their services that address the topic, coupons, specials, recipes, etc. all in the same vein, is the difference in whether someone signs up for their site and cashes in the coupons they offer. I could regurgitate facts from Internet research, but the post would be dry as dirt and far too technical for their average client. When I write for IT companies, I include the products—software, hardware, apps—they have tried, along with information on what worked and what didn’t meet their expectations and the hype. These are the experts readers turn to when making purchase decisions.

Article: Grammar and spelling correctly are optional on a blog and optimal in an article.
MC: Ridiculous on sooo many levels.

Do you honestly believe that misspelled words and grammar mistakes, which aren’t intentional like using the word “sooo”, improve your professional appearance online? However, having fun with regional idioms and words you create like I wrote last week with “bloggish” make you as the writer more human and win followers, which is the name of the game. One thing I have always liked about Hope Clark on her Funds for Writers sites is the casual and friendly pictures she posts of herself, her dogs and chickens, her gardens. They bring her to life on the page. I learned quickly to respect her weekly editorials and referral sites for freelance work, contests, grants, etc., but it was her smiling face that lured me in that first year. I’ve been following her for ten years!

Article: A blog post has no interviews; an article has research and interviews from experts.
MC: This no longer applies. They both have interviews and research.

Interviews build credibility for the owner of the blog/website and the person being interviewed. You gain respect for your contact capability and insider knowledge. The expert, well, you know that part.

Create a list of questions to draw from. Use four to six of them that speak to the expert’s specialty. Be sure and include “insider” questions such as what is your favorite writer, quote, book, food, or vacation - anything that makes them more human and humane. Think this doesn’t work? Look at any magazine on the newsstand. Almost 100% of them have at least one interview. Pull questions from those lists to make your list reader-friendly. If you are knowledgeable, readers will keep coming back.

Article: A blog always focuses on SEO’s (search engine optimization); an article doesn’t.
MC: The assumption here is that search engines don’t care about keywords in an article; they let the length do all the work. Not absolutely true.

When Google tightened down on keyword stuffing, some people assumed keywords were a waste of time. If your piece is to promote your new fiction book about preppers in the United States, and you don’t use the title of your book, the words preppers or United States or better yet, preppers in the United States, frequently in the article, particularly the title of the post, how are browsers going to find your piece? I won’t go into the standard way of calculating keyword density here, but there is a basic formula to use. If you want more info, go to http://www.bestseoideas.com/seo-factors/keyword-density-formula-calculation-for-google-seo-6 or http://www.ehow.com/how_2341682_calculate-keyword-density.html. If you type calculating keyword density into your browser, you will see hundreds of other sites as well.

Responding to Comments
Never ignore a comment to your post or article. Never.* Unless you don’t care about what your readers have to say or think it’s stupid, or your disagree so vehemently, you snatch out a handful of hair when your read it.

Take a few minutes to think about what you want to say and then type. A simple “Thank You.” isn’t enough. Come on, you’re a writer, you can think of at least one sentence to explain what you are thanking them for.

Example 1: “Mahala, I agree with your comments about freelance blogging. My experience is….”
“Thank you, Marilyn. I had a similar experience when….”

Example 2:  “Mahala, I completely disagree with your comments about freelance blogging. The people I wrote for were rude and never wanted to pay me more than $10 for a 300-word post! What a waste of my time!!! You shouldn’t encourage writers to take that kind of money.” 
“Thank you for your feedback, Marilyn. I’ve also talked to potential clients who wanted to pay low fees, some as low as .0001 a word. I never work with people who aren’t willing to pay a respectable fee for the research and time it takes to create a professional piece. Best of luck with your freelance work.”
If James Scott Bell, Rhys Bowen, James Patterson, Hope Clark, Stephen King, and other very busy and popular authors can take the time to respond to hundreds of comments weekly, I can do my part in my slip of the world. And, yes, I know that these authors may pay a person to do the responding for them, but what does that say about them? They respect their readers enough to pay out of their own pocket to ensure that each comment gets a personal response.

*Except for obvious spams, which we were inundated with several years ago. This brings up another point. Always, always, always have administrative control over the posting of comments, so that a comment is never posted online for the public to see unless you approved it. It’s a control mechanism that comes with every reputable blog and website vendor, and you can opt in or out of the control.

Headlines (aka as titles)
One final thing about headlines to encourage readers to click on your post/article. In September 20, 2013, Marcy Kennedy, author of Strong Female Characters wrote a guest article on http://writersinthestorm.com, an excellent site with valuable information. It did a beautiful job of explaining how to write killer headlines and why that is important. I mentioned this last week, but it bears repeating. Go to their archives to read the rest of the article. The example on bacon is wonderful. This is the idea Marcy explains:

The Shocking Truth About Doctors (vague) What shocking truth about what? Overweight cardiologists? Anesthesiologists who steal from patients under anesthesia?

The Shocking Truth About What Your Doctor Might Be Doing to Harm Your Health (specific)
Marcy reminds writers to follow with a piece that gives the reader an obvious benefit. What’s the takeaway from the piece? In a piece like this, it obviously needs fact-based research with article references to back it up. This goes back to my post last week. What do you want the reader to see, know, and learn after they read your piece. See previous post in Archives on Blog Post vs Article/August 26, 2015.

If writing headlines send you around the bend (Southern for drive you crazy), go back to the magazine section of the library or newsstand and look at the covers. Magazine marketers are experts at writing headlines, so we will buy their magazine.

Drop me a comment about your experiences with your freelance and personal writing of blog/site posts and articles!

Write Like You Mean It   ~ Mahala